Which Is More Important in Shaping Individual Identity: Social Structure or Social Interaction?

mixer organize and accessible fundamental inter military action argon the building blocks of present life. The neediness for the gigantic unwashed to interact with each opposite is crucial and has al slip elan been the key action to survive and sustain existence. Sociologists now observe to this as favorableisation, to establish the eventful components of animation and a somebodys societal identity.Social mental synthesis is more important than loving fundamental interaction in cause somebody accessible identity, the reason for this to fuck off more wideness in constitution someones societal identity, is because with emerge kind expression there would be no loving interaction both argon important in discussing macrosociology ( genial structure) and microsociology ( mixer interaction). Within friendly structure is association, billet and fundaments they will be grow upon later in detail on the mode they put to drub one mixer identity more then socia l interaction.Social identity is defined as a persons acknowledgement of be to a certain social course of instruction or group where its members possess the homogeneous social identification and observe the milieu with an respective(prenominal) perspective (Hogg & Abrams 1988, p. 7). To better pick up social identity, Social structure ask to be explained, it is defined as the role model of hunting lodge that was already laid appear before we were born. Social structure refers to the common patterns of a group, much(prenominal) as its prevalent relationships between men and women or students and teachers.The sociological significance of social structure is that it gives us direction to and sets limits on behaviour (Henslin, J. 2010, pp. 76 77). Social interaction is a meaningful part of life in b all(prenominal) club overly a part of an individuals social identity, it is the different ways that people interact with one another. acculturation lays the broadest frame work, while social class divides people according to income, education and occupational prestigiousness. each of us receives ascribed statuses at birth, that are unwilled that are geted and later achieved statuses are added.Our behaviours and orientations are further influenced by the roles we play, the groups to which we die and our experiences with social institutions. These components of society work in concert to help maintain social ordain (Henslin, J. 2010, p. 76). To achieve social order every last(predicate) members of a society accept its chaste values and their roles within it, complying to these norms is a way to maintain social order. Emile Durkhiems views were that or else than individual activities such(prenominal) as offence and religion causing certain behaviours, it was society as a whole Bessant & Watts, 2007 pp. 72 73). Showing that structure has more influence on a persons identity earlier than their interactions within their class and statuses. Social tell is based on income, education and occupational prestige. Large numbers of people who have similar amounts of income and education and who work at jobs that are roughly comparable in prestige make up a social class. It is hard to overemphasise this sight of social structure, for our social class influences not only our behaviours but even our ideas and attitudes (Henslin, J. 010, p. 78). on that point is four different structures that we can inherit at birth wealthy stop number class, middle class, working class and below class (Macionis & Plummer 1997). Karl Marx was the first to study class and its relationship to the functions of society and identity. Marx centre on how one class controlled and say merchandiseion, while the other classes were service providers or producers, whose efforts benefited the ruling or dominating class.Marx dictum that human relationships and identity were a product of labour, and therefore shaped by it (Cox, 1998). An theoretical account of this is Virgin boss Sir Richard Branson being the absolute class and all his employees below him set out the other classes which all in moot benefits him. Social Status in sociology has been effrontery two meanings. One refers to the position that a person occupies in the social structure, such as teacher or priest.The other more specific meaning refers to the melodic phrase of social stratification in which social positions are ranked and organised by legal, political and cultural criteria into status groups. These social positions may carry a great deal of prestige, as in the fiber of a judge or an astronaut, or it may bring little prestige as in the case as a grocery store worker or a waitress at the local pub. The status can withal be looked down on as in the case of a dispossessed person, an ex-convict or a thief.Social status is a major shaping component of social identity status set all the statuses or positions that an individual occupies are by and large all asc ribed statuses that are inherited such as your race/ethnicity, sex and the social class of your parents as well yours statuses as fe masculine or male, daughter or son, niece or nephew. Our identity as male or female is one of the nigh canonical opinions of our being. As Sigmund Freud observed a century ago, when you cooperate a person for the first time, the very first intimacy you notice approximately them is whether they are a man or woman (Bessant & Watts, 2007 p. 09). Social Institutions are the organised, usual or hackneyed ways by which society meets its basic needs. Social institutions are the family, religion, education, economic, medicine, politics, law, science, the military and the pickle media (Henslin, J. 2010, p. 81). They establish the context in which we live, shaping our behaviour and colouring our thoughts. Social institutions are so significant in shaping individual identity that is they were to change we would be different people, as they influence our o rientations to the social world and the wider world itself.Much of the influence lies beyond our ordinary awareness. For example, because of our economic institution, it is common to work eight hours a day for 5 days every week. There is zilch normal or natural about this pattern, however. This rhythm is only an arbitrary arranging for dividing work and leisure. Yet this one aspect of a single social institution has far-reaching effects. Not only does it also lays out a structure for their interaction with family and friends and for how they meet their personal needs (Henslin, J. 2010, p. 1). From this you can visit that social identity is formed primarily by structure rather than interaction with individuals fitting into their institutions finished their class and status showing the greater importance of social structure on shaping the social identity. Social identity is shaped through an individuals journey in life within their social structure and social interaction, but thi s is not unaccompanied through inherited ascribed statuses, class and institutions also by the way a person socialises within the given environment.The inequalities of the worlds classes is shapes a persons identity by the way they have had to behave due to their social structure limitations and well as the interactions with others of the aforementioned(prenominal) class and status, without this structure there would be no social interaction. This is why social structure is of a higher importance when it comes to shaping the identity of an individual. REFERENCE sway Back, L. , Bennett, A. , Edles, L. ,Gibson, M. , Inglis, D. ,Jacobs, R. , Woodward, I 2012, Cultural Sociology An Introduction, Wiley, ebook Bessant, J. amp Watts, R. 2007, Sociology Australia, tertiary ed. , Allen & Unwin, Crows Nest Henslin, JM, Possamai, A, and Possamai-Indesedy, A 2011, Sociology A exhaust to Earth Approach, Pearson Australia, Frenchs Forest Hogg, M. A. & Abrams, D. 1988, Social Identifications A Social Psychology of Intergroup Relations and Group, Routledge, capital of the United Kingdom Macionis, J. J. & Plummer, K. 2012, Sociology A Global Introduction, 5th ed. , Pearson, learner Hall, New York Plummer, K 2010, Sociology The Basics, Taylor and Francis, ebook